Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:54:58 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH]sched: Isochronous class v2 for unprivileged soft rt scheduling |
| |
* Jack O'Quin <joq@io.com> wrote:
> I finally made new kernel builds for the latest patches from both Ingo > and Con. I kept the two patch sets separate, as they modify some of > the same files. > > I ran three sets of tests with three or more 5 minute runs for each > case. The results (log files and graphs) are in these directories... > > 1) sched-fifo -- as a baseline > http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/sched-fifo > > 2) sched-iso -- Con's scheduler, no privileges > http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/sched-iso > > 3) nice-20 -- Ingo's "nice --20" scheduler hack > http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/nice-20
thanks for the testing. The important result is that nice--20 performance is roughly the same as SCHED_ISO. This somewhat reduces the urgency of the introduction of SCHED_ISO.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |