[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 1/13] Qsort
    On 23 Jan 2005, at 03:39, Andi Kleen wrote:

    > Felipe Alfaro Solana <> writes:
    >> AFAIK, XOR is quite expensive on IA32 when compared to simple MOV
    >> operatings. Also, since the original patch uses 3 MOVs to perform the
    >> swapping, and your version uses 3 XOR operations, I don't see any
    >> gains.
    > Both are one cycle latency for register<->register on all x86 cores
    > I've looked at. What makes you think differently?

    I thought XOR was more expensie. Anyways, I still don't see any
    advantage in replacing 3 MOVs with 3 XORs.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.019 / U:5.992 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site