[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: seccomp for 2.6.11-rc1-bk8

    > > Well, then you can help auditing ptrace()... It is probably also true
    > > that more people audited ptrace() than seccomp :-).
    > Why should I spend time auditing ptrace when I have a superior solution
    > that doesn't require me any auditing at all? I've an huge pile of
    > work,

    Adding code is easy, but in the long term would lead to maintainance
    nightmare. Adding seccomp code that does subset of ptrace, just
    because ptrace audit is lot of work, seems like a wrong thing to
    do. Sorry.

    People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
    ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.019 / U:5.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site