lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 1/3] spinlock fix #1, *_can_lock() primitives

    * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:

    > I don't want to break all the other architectures. Or at least not
    > most of them. Especially since I was hoping to do a -pre2 soon (well,
    > like today, but I guess that's out..) and make the 2.6.11 cycle
    > shorter than 2.6.10.

    if we remove the debugging check from exit.c then the only thing that
    might break in an architecture is SMP+PREEMPT, which is rarely used
    outside of the x86-ish architectures.

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:4.072 / U:0.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site