Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:57:02 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/3] spinlock fix #1, *_can_lock() primitives |
| |
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
> I don't want to break all the other architectures. Or at least not > most of them. Especially since I was hoping to do a -pre2 soon (well, > like today, but I guess that's out..) and make the 2.6.11 cycle > shorter than 2.6.10.
if we remove the debugging check from exit.c then the only thing that might break in an architecture is SMP+PREEMPT, which is rarely used outside of the x86-ish architectures.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |