lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 18 Jan 2005 22:49:57 -0800
FromChris Wright <>
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] consolidate arch specific resource.h headers
* Bill Rugolsky Jr. (brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:10:56PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > +#define INIT_RLIMITS					\
> > +{							\
> > +	{ RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY },		\
> > +	{ RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY },		\
> > +	{ RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY },		\
> > +	{      _STK_LIM, _STK_LIM_MAX  },		\
> > +	{             0, RLIM_INFINITY },		\
> > +	{ RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY },		\
> > +	{             0,             0 },		\
> > +	{      INR_OPEN,     INR_OPEN  },		\
> > +	{   MLOCK_LIMIT,   MLOCK_LIMIT },		\
> > +	{ RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY },		\
> > +	{ RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY },		\
> > +	{ MAX_SIGPENDING, MAX_SIGPENDING },		\
> > +	{ MQ_BYTES_MAX, MQ_BYTES_MAX },			\
> > +}
> 
> While you are rooting around in there, perhaps this block
> should be converted to C99 initializer syntax, to avoid
> problems if arch-specific changes are later introduced?

Yes, I had considered the same.  I had checked a couple arches and with
proper designated initializers, that bit would not need to be duplicated.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2008