lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] consolidate arch specific resource.h headers
    * Bill Rugolsky Jr. (brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com) wrote:
    > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:10:56PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
    > > +#define INIT_RLIMITS \
    > > +{ \
    > > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
    > > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
    > > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
    > > + { _STK_LIM, _STK_LIM_MAX }, \
    > > + { 0, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
    > > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
    > > + { 0, 0 }, \
    > > + { INR_OPEN, INR_OPEN }, \
    > > + { MLOCK_LIMIT, MLOCK_LIMIT }, \
    > > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
    > > + { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY }, \
    > > + { MAX_SIGPENDING, MAX_SIGPENDING }, \
    > > + { MQ_BYTES_MAX, MQ_BYTES_MAX }, \
    > > +}
    >
    > While you are rooting around in there, perhaps this block
    > should be converted to C99 initializer syntax, to avoid
    > problems if arch-specific changes are later introduced?

    Yes, I had considered the same. I had checked a couple arches and with
    proper designated initializers, that bit would not need to be duplicated.

    thanks,
    -chris
    --
    Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.019 / U:139.076 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site