Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:34:29 -0500 | | From | Jeff Garzik <> | | Subject | Re: iswraid and 2.4.x? |
| |
Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:13:23PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>Martins Krikis wrote: >> >>>--- Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>It seems the general consensus is to merge iswraid, so I'm fine with >>>>it. >>>> >>>>Martins, we are approaching -rc stage, I would prefer the merge to >>>>happen >>>>at the beginning of 2.4.29-pre. Is that fine for you? >>> >>> >>>Marcelo, >>> >>>I seemed to have missed the 2.4.29-pre stages, unfortunately. >>>Are you planning on a 2.4.30, too? I'd still love to get >>>iswraid accepted in the 2.4 tree eventually... >>> >>>The version that's out on SourceForge right now would be alright >>>as is with the 2.4.29-x kernels, if that's any help. In about a >>>week I'm planning to have a new version that adds RAID10 support >>>for the ICH7R-based machines. Please let me know what my options >>>are (if any) regarding getting iswraid in 2.4. >> >>I ACK getting this into 2.4, as well... > > > OK, can you please review if for 2.4.30-pre Jeff ?
Check your inbox from months ago ;-) AFAICS his current version addresses all the comments from Alan and myself, from when it hit lkml 6 months(?) ago...
I'll give it another quick lookover though, sure.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |