[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: patch to fix set_itimer() behaviour in boundary cases
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 10:58:45AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> I don't see a valid reason to restrict/reject input that is accepted
> now and dealt with reasonably because some standard says so (if you
> design a new api, following the standard is nice of course). I don't
> see "doesn't reject a condition that can reasonable be dealt with"
> as a good reason to go double ABI at all.

we could printk for now and if nobody reports this to lkml (as they
do/did with oldish tcpdump/libpcap a while ago) we could -EINVAL

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.043 / U:1.676 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site