[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] mm: Reimplementation of dynamic percpu memory allocator
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, is bubble
> sort unpopular or having two sort functions in the kernel source tree an
> issue here?

yes and yes ;)

> >
> > Why cannot the code simply call vmalloc rather than copying its internals?
> Node local allocation. vmalloc cannot ensure pages for correspomding
> cpus are node local. Also, design goal was to allocate pages for
> cpu_possible cpus only. With plain vmalloc, we will end up allocating
> pages for NR_CPUS.

So... is it not possible to enhance vmalloc() for node-awareness, then
just use it?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.047 / U:5.328 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site