lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
>
> The closest thing to concensus I've seen yet was a new rlimit for
> scheduling with code from Chris Wright.

hmm, yes. It doesn't feel like an rlimity thing to me, unless the rlimit
actually _limits_ something. Say, minimum permissible nice level. But
scheduling policy sounds more like a capability than an rlimit.

> We really ought not get in
> the habit of adding new rlimits though.

How come? It's a real pita that the standard shells don't appear to have a
way of setting an unknown rlimit. But what else?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.509 / U:0.800 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site