Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:04:23 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM |
| |
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote: > > The closest thing to concensus I've seen yet was a new rlimit for > scheduling with code from Chris Wright.
hmm, yes. It doesn't feel like an rlimity thing to me, unless the rlimit actually _limits_ something. Say, minimum permissible nice level. But scheduling policy sounds more like a capability than an rlimit.
> We really ought not get in > the habit of adding new rlimits though.
How come? It's a real pita that the standard shells don't appear to have a way of setting an unknown rlimit. But what else? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |