lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM
    Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
    >
    > The closest thing to concensus I've seen yet was a new rlimit for
    > scheduling with code from Chris Wright.

    hmm, yes. It doesn't feel like an rlimity thing to me, unless the rlimit
    actually _limits_ something. Say, minimum permissible nice level. But
    scheduling policy sounds more like a capability than an rlimit.

    > We really ought not get in
    > the habit of adding new rlimits though.

    How come? It's a real pita that the standard shells don't appear to have a
    way of setting an unknown rlimit. But what else?
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.133 / U:29.288 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site