![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote: > > The closest thing to concensus I've seen yet was a new rlimit for > scheduling with code from Chris Wright. hmm, yes. It doesn't feel like an rlimity thing to me, unless the rlimit actually _limits_ something. Say, minimum permissible nice level. But scheduling policy sounds more like a capability than an rlimit. > We really ought not get in > the habit of adding new rlimits though. How come? It's a real pita that the standard shells don't appear to have a way of setting an unknown rlimit. But what else? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||