Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.10-mm3 scaling problem with inotify | From | Robert Love <> | Date | Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:15:49 -0500 |
| |
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 10:05 -0800, John Hawkes wrote:
> The patch shows a substantial 4x improvement for my specific workload (@64p), > although I can still envision workloads that will stimulate high spinlock > contention from spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock). First things first -- let's get > this fix into the -mm tree. Thanks!
Glad it worked!
Does the spin_lock() show up in dnotify's code path? It is getting called, unconditionally, there, too.
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |