Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:45:37 +0100 | From | Sander <> | Subject | NUMA or not on dual Opteron (was: Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc1) |
| |
Linus Torvalds wrote (ao): > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Sergey S. Kostyliov wrote: > > 2.6.10-rc1 hangs at boot stage for my dual opteron machine > > Oops, yes. There's some recent NUMA breakage - either disable > CONFIG_NUMA, or apply the patches that Andi Kleen just posted on the > mailing list (the second option much preferred, just to verify that > yes, that does fix it).
I was under the impression that NUMA is useful on > 2-way systems only. Is this true, and if not, under what circumstances is NUMA useful on 2-way Opteron systems?
In other words: why should one want NUMA to be enabled or disabled for dual Opteron?
Thanks in advance.
-- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |