[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM
    Paul Davis wrote:
    >>>Paul. Everyone agrees with you. I think. We just need to work out
    >>>the best way of doing it.
    >>>Would I be right in suspecting that we know what to do, but nobody has
    >>>stepped up to write the code? It's kinda looking like that?
    >>I thought I made it clear i had already volunteered. I was after a
    >>response to my proposal for how to do it.
    > I think your proposal is a good (maybe even excellent) one, but it
    > somewhat sidesteps the issue (which may be the best thing to
    > do). Rather than answering the question "how best to allow regular
    > users access to SCHED_FIFO", it says "lets offer regular users
    > SCHED_ISO which is essentially identical to SCHED_FIFO unless tasks
    > running SCHED_ISO use too much cpu time".
    > its a fine answer, but its the answer to a slightly different
    > question. if anyone (maybe us audio freaks, maybe someone else) comes
    > up with a reason to want "The Real SCHED_FIFO", the original question
    > will have gone unanswered.

    Ah then you missed something. You can set the max cpu of SCHED_ISO to
    100% and then you have it.

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.021 / U:41.128 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site