[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: NUMA or not on dual Opteron
"Justin M. Forbes" <> writes:

> This is somewhat true. There are 2 types of dual opteron boards. Those in
> the $200 US range only have one memory bank, which is attached to CPU0.
> They operate as a single node, and may perform better with numa turned off.
> Those in the $400+ range tend to have one bank per CPU and will certainly
> perform better with numa on. They do usually have a bios option to
> interleave the nodes which would show up as a single node, and probably
> perform better with numa turned off, but a better solution is to turn off
> the node interleave in bios and run the kernel with numa support.
> Basically if you have 2 CPUs and only one memory bank, maybe turning numa
> off will give better performance, but if you have one memory bank per CPU
> numa should be on.

[agreed, except:]

There is no significant performance difference between NUMA on and off
on the crippled boards. So best is to always enable CONFIG_NUMA on x86-64.
The distribution kernels for x86-64 should ship in this configuration

I would recommend to always disable node interleaved on the non crippled
board with multiple memory banks. Most boards ship with this disabled by
default, only a few enable it.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.074 / U:2.972 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site