![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 09:09:24PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > I stress-tested this patch very heavily and it never oopsed so I am > confident of it's stability, so what is left is to look at the results of > this patch were and I think they look promising in a number of respects. I > have graphs that do not translate to text very well, so I'll just point you > to http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/projects/mbuddy-results-1 instead. This graph rather hard to comprehend. > The results were not spectacular but still very interesting. Under heavy > stresing (updatedb + 4 simultaneous -j4 kernel compiles with avg load 15) > fragmentation is consistently lower than the standard allocator. It could > also be a lot better if there was some means of purging caches, userpages > and buffers but thats in the future. For the moment, the only real control > I had was the buffer pages. You might stress higher order page allocation with a) 8k stacks turned on b) UDP NFS with large read/write. > Opinions/Feedback? Looks interesting. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||