![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 03:53:50PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > If you turned the current model upsidedown and vendor-sec learned > about issues from security@kernel.org a few days before it'd at > least give us *some* time, as opposed to just springing stuff > on us without warning. I think having security@ notify vendor-sec when it finds a real problem would be a good idea, as a lot of stuff is just sifting through finding the root cause and fix. And if security@ still has it's "5 day countdown" type thing, that still gives you (and me) at least a few days to run around like mad to update things, which is better than nothing :) thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||