lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 12 Jan 2005 22:43:26 +0100
FromAndi Kleen <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fix: macros to detect existance of unlocked_ioctl and compat_ioctl
> No, we do not do that in the kernel today, and I'm pretty sure we don't

Actually we do. e.g. take a look at skbuff.h HAVE_*
There are other examples too.

> want to start doing it (it would get _huge_ very quickly...)

I disagree since the alternative is so ugly.


> Please don't apply this.  Remember, out-of-the-tree modules are on their
> own.

I don't know who made this "policy", but actively sabotating or denying 
useful facilities to free out of tree modules doesn't seem to be a 
very wise policy to me.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2008