![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Chris Wright wrote:> > > > Right, I know you don't like the embargo stuff.> > I'd very happy with a "private" list in the sense that people wouldn't > feel pressured to fix it that day, and I think it makes sense to have some > policy where we don't necessarily make them public immediately in order to > give people the time to discuss them. > > But it should be very clear that no entity (neither the reporter nor any > particular vendor/developer) can require silence, or ask for anything more > than "let's find the right solution". A purely _technical_ delay, in other > words, with no politics or other issues involved. > Being firmly in the full disclosure camp I hope you intend to stick to that "no entity (neither the reporter nor any particular vendor/developer) can require silence" bit. If you do, and if embargoes are kept to short nr. of days, then I think such a list would probably be a good idea. It would be a good compromise between full disclosure from day one and things being kept secret and out of view for months. Just my 0.02euro. -- Jesper Juhl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||