[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: thoughts on kernel security issues
    * Greg KH ( wrote:
    > On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:01:42AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Greg KH wrote:
    > > > So you would be for a closed list, but there would be no incentive at
    > > > all for anyone on the list to keep the contents of what was posted to
    > > > the list closed at any time? That goes against the above stated goal of
    > > > complying with RFPolicy.
    > >
    > > There's already vendor-sec. I assume they follow RFPolicy already. If it's
    > > just another vendor-sec, why would you put up a new list for it?
    > I think the issue is that there is no main "security" contact for the
    > kernel. If we want to make vendor-sec that contact, fine, but we better
    > warn the vendor-sec people :)

    Yes. And I think we should have our own contact.

    > > In other words, if you allow embargoes and vendor politics, what would the
    > > new list buy that isn't already in vendor-sec.
    > vendor-sec handles a lot of other stuff that is not kernel related
    > (every package that is in a distro.) This would only be for the kernel.

    Yes, and IMO, it could inform vendor-sec.

    Linux Security Modules
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.029 / U:84.976 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site