[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: thoughts on kernel security issues
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:01:42AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > So you would be for a closed list, but there would be no incentive at
> > all for anyone on the list to keep the contents of what was posted to
> > the list closed at any time? That goes against the above stated goal of
> > complying with RFPolicy.
> There's already vendor-sec. I assume they follow RFPolicy already. If it's
> just another vendor-sec, why would you put up a new list for it?

I think the issue is that there is no main "security" contact for the
kernel. If we want to make vendor-sec that contact, fine, but we better
warn the vendor-sec people :)

> In other words, if you allow embargoes and vendor politics, what would the
> new list buy that isn't already in vendor-sec.

vendor-sec handles a lot of other stuff that is not kernel related
(every package that is in a distro.) This would only be for the kernel.


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.204 / U:6.812 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site