[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM
    Chris Wright wrote:
    > * Ingo Molnar ( wrote:
    >>you are right, i forgot about kernel threads. If they are nice -10 on
    >>Jack's system too then they are within striking range indeed, especially
    >>since they are typically idle and if then they are active for short
    >>bursts of time and get the maximum boost. Jack, could you renice these
    >>to -5, to make sure they dont interfere?
    > Yup, their bursty nature makes them seem a likely culprit.
    >>btw., why are these at nice -10? workqueue.c sets nice value to -5
    > Heh, I was just wondering the same thing.
    > BTW, grepping set_user_nice shows a few more possible culprits.
    > One more reason that there may be value in promoting the audio app to
    > rt scheduling.

    They were nice -10. I changed them to nice -5 recently in -mm and that
    just got commited to -bk post 2.6.10

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.021 / U:10.276 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site