lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 9 Sep 2004 22:51:41 +0200
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk12-R6
* Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:

> > I believe Scott Wood suggested a fix back when I first reported this,
> > have to check my mailbox.  Scott?> > Nope, checking the original thread, Scott pointed out that any RT
> process will have mlockall'ed anyway and thus won't be affected by
> this latency.  So, this one would be cool to fix, but it's not a
> problem as such.

RT threads will be affected by this latency just as much because it's a
non-preemptable critical section. You are right in that an RT task wont
see the overhead itself because it doesnt generate swap entries.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [from the cache]
©2003-2008