[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Patch 2/6]: ext3 reservations: Renumber the ext3 reservations ioctls
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:41:38AM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 23:53, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Maybe you could reuse the XFS reservation ioctls instead of adding
> > another set? Having incompatible APIs for the same thing on different
> > filesystems sounds like the wrong way to go.
> I don't mind either way. But I just looked, and I think they are doing
> different things. If I'm reading the XFS bits right, the XFS ioctls
> actively reserve/free disk space; but the ext3 ones do nothing except
> set/query the size of the per-inode sliding reservation window.
> So sounds like they are best kept separate for now.

makes sense.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.036 / U:0.952 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site