lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] new timeofday core subsystem (v.A0)
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 17:02, George Anzinger wrote:
    > > Again, monotonic_clock() and friends are NTP adjusted, so drift caused
    > > by inaccurate calibration shouldn't be a problem the interval timer code
    > > should need to worry about (outside of maybe adjusting its interval time
    > > if its always arriving late/early). If possible the timesource
    > > calibration code should be improved, but that's icing on the cake and
    > > isn't critical.
    > >
    > Are you providing a way to predict what clock count provide a given time offset
    > INCLUDING ntp? If so, cool. If not we need to get this conversion right. We
    > will go into this more on your return.

    Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. Mind expanding on the idea while my
    brain warms back up?

    thanks
    -john


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:4.045 / U:0.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site