Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:28:42 -0400 (EDT) | From | Zwane Mwaikambo <> | Subject | Re: [patch] preempt-smp.patch, 2.6.9-rc1-bk14 |
| |
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> at a quick glance your patch doesnt seem to cover the following locking > primitives: read_lock_irqsave(), read_lock_irq(), write_lock_irqsave, > write_lock_irq(). Also, i think your 2.6.6 patch doesnt apply anymore > because it clashes with your very nice out-of-line spinlocks patch that > went into -BK recently ;)
Yes i intentionally avoided rwlocks, in that case i think write_lock_* would be the one to work on, but this is all covered by CONFIG_PREEMPT and your patch now.
Thanks, Zwane - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |