lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] preempt-smp.patch, 2.6.9-rc1-bk14
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> at a quick glance your patch doesnt seem to cover the following locking
> primitives: read_lock_irqsave(), read_lock_irq(), write_lock_irqsave,
> write_lock_irq(). Also, i think your 2.6.6 patch doesnt apply anymore
> because it clashes with your very nice out-of-line spinlocks patch that
> went into -BK recently ;)

Yes i intentionally avoided rwlocks, in that case i think write_lock_*
would be the one to work on, but this is all covered by CONFIG_PREEMPT and
your patch now.

Thanks,
Zwane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.051 / U:0.804 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site