[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: silent semantic changes with reiser4
    Christer Weinigel <> wrote:

    > Additionally, files-as-directores does not solve the problem of
    > "cp a b" losing named streams. There is curently no copyfile syscall
    > in the Linux kernel, "cp a b" essentially does "cat a >b". So unless
    > cp is modified we don't gain anything. If cp is modified to know
    > about named streams, it really does not matter if named streams are
    > accessed as file-as-directories, via openat(3) or via a shared library
    > with some other interface.

    You cannot just 'modify cp'. cp is a programming interface standardized
    in POSIX.1. You can of course add non-standard extensions to some cp
    implementations, but it seems hardly evitable then that you either have
    to use cp in a non-standard manner regularly with Linux or risk to lose

    This is even more severe with tar/pax. Just patching GNU tar for file
    streams, as it was suggested earlier in this discussion, is still far
    away from a real solution because it neither solves the issues with
    the POSIX.1 pax standard nor those with other implementations of it.

    Given these facts, it does not seem so clear to me that adding named
    streams for Windows and Mac OS interoperability would be a win to Linux
    in the end. The loss of interoperability to Unix/POSIX/today's Linux
    might have much worse effects.

    The current xattr extension is much less of a problem because it only
    holds metadata, which is mostly not applicable to other environments


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.020 / U:2.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site