[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] copyfile: copyfile
    On Tue, 7 September 2004 07:59:11 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Jörn Engel wrote:
    > >
    > > Does that mean that you're ok with the first three patches?
    > No, it means that they weren't fundamentally flawed..

    It's a start...

    > Actually, the 4kB batching one was - if you only max out to using 4kB at a
    > time, sendfile() is kind of pointless, because then it will never do
    > multi-page copies in the first place, and all the complexity at a lower
    > level is worthless..

    Give me a better number. 16k? 1M? Or would it not be fundamentally
    flawed if the unit was seconds, instead of bytes? That makes a lot
    more sense, since a floppy and a Ultra320 RAID array differ slightly
    in speed and it's response time the users actually care about.


    /* Keep these two variables together */
    int bar;
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.021 / U:59.936 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site