lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 04 Sep 2004 09:35:45 -0500
From"K.R. Foley" <>
SubjectRe: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R3
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * K.R. Foley <kr@cybsft.com> wrote:
>
>
>>After hammering the system for a little more than an hour it gave up.
>>I don't have the serial logging setup yet because I haven't had time
>>this evening. I will be glad to do whatever I can to try to help debug
>>this, but it will have to wait until tomorrow. The log is here:
>>
>>http://www.cybsft.com/testresults/crashes/2.6.9-rc1-vo-R3.txt
>
>
> fyi, i have now triggered a similar crash on a testbox too. It takes
> quite some time to trigger but it does.
>
> since it happens with VP=0,KP=0,SP=0,HP=0 as well it should be one of
> the cond_resched_lock() (or cond_resched()) additions.
>
> Ingo
>

I am glad that it's reproducible for you as well. How did you trigger
it? Because it seems to only crash under heavy load for me. The system
has been up since I rebooted last night after the crash and I haven't
seen any problems. Same thing goes for up until last night when I booted
the new patch. Even building the new patch didn't seem to be enough to
trigger it.

kr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2010