Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sat, 04 Sep 2004 09:35:45 -0500 | | From | "K.R. Foley" <> | | Subject | Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R3 |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * K.R. Foley <kr@cybsft.com> wrote: > > >>After hammering the system for a little more than an hour it gave up. >>I don't have the serial logging setup yet because I haven't had time >>this evening. I will be glad to do whatever I can to try to help debug >>this, but it will have to wait until tomorrow. The log is here: >> >>http://www.cybsft.com/testresults/crashes/2.6.9-rc1-vo-R3.txt > > > fyi, i have now triggered a similar crash on a testbox too. It takes > quite some time to trigger but it does. > > since it happens with VP=0,KP=0,SP=0,HP=0 as well it should be one of > the cond_resched_lock() (or cond_resched()) additions. > > Ingo >
I am glad that it's reproducible for you as well. How did you trigger it? Because it seems to only crash under heavy load for me. The system has been up since I rebooted last night after the crash and I haven't seen any problems. Same thing goes for up until last night when I booted the new patch. Even building the new patch didn't seem to be enough to trigger it.
kr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |