[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][1/1] Per-priority statistics for CFQ w/iopriorities
    Jens Axboe wrote:
    > Hi,
    > Missed this patch the first time over (thank you lwn :-) - why are you
    > using atomic counters? In all the paths you set them, you already have
    > the queue lock.

    Thats right, there's no need for them. I used these instinctively....
    Will fix in next version, unless (hint, hint) you're taking a look at
    adding priorities back to mainline's CFQ.

    -- Shailabh
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.019 / U:5.560 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site