[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.10.0
    On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 10:41 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
    > Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > Why don't you pass a file descriptor into the syscall instead of a pathname?
    > > You can then take a ref on the inode and userspace can close the file.
    > > That gets you permission checking for free.
    > For passing in the data, that would work. Wouldn't you still need a name or
    > path when getting data back though?

    Does Andrew mean an fd on the thing being watched?

    That is what we are trying to fix with dnotify: the open fd's are pin
    the device and prevent unmount, making notification on removable devices
    impossible. Such a 1:1 relationship also opens way too many fd's.

    Robert Love

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.019 / U:159.168 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site