Messages in this thread | | | From | Oliver Neukum <> | Subject | Re: Linux PM core problems | Date | Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:34:32 +0200 |
| |
Am Montag, 27. September 2004 19:02 schrieb Patrick Mochel: > > On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, David Brownell wrote: > > > What, the audience that understands USB shouldn't be expected > > to (a) discuss USB-related PM issues, except on non-USB lists; or > > (b) involve developers who know other parts of PM? Nonsense. > > I didn't say that. But, the thread (especially given the Subject) is about > how the core works. And, most of the relevant USB people seem to be on > linux-kernel, or can easily be cc'd as well. And, what about Benh, who has > suffered through this problems on ppc for just as long?
OK, the cc list can easily be extended.
[..] > > There's been a notable lack of discussion about USB-related PM issues, > > except in these recent threads. So "read the archives" isn't constructive. > > This thread seems to lack USB-centricity. I know you've read the archives > and have participated in the discussions. But most, if not all, of the > ideas have come up in one form or another (though many with poor timing). > We're re-hashing the same discussion over and over. Not that that is a bad > thing, because eventually someone will get sick of reading it all just fix > the stupid code. > > My issue is that core problems are being talked about on a splinter list > and they should move to linux-kernel. But, if we're going to do that, it's > imperative to understand the history and the context, and know that we > have the same problem as we did 4 years ago (albeit with a different > playing field).
Why? What makes this field so hard? Would you be happy if we listed the problems USB has with the current code?
Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |