[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [2.6] smbfs & "du" illness
    On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 01:21:29PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > I repeat: the Linux client is apparently better off ignoring it totally.
    > That makes it meaningless, Jeremy.

    Currently I can't argue with you on that.

    > After all, the only thing we can use it for is st_blocks, and since the
    > granularity is _so_ big, we're much better off looking at the file size
    > and guessing from that.
    > Tell me again: why should the Linux client look at that number? Give me
    > just _one_ valid reason.

    Right now (Samba 3.0.7) you are correct. But the intent is
    to fix it going forward, so that in non-broken server implementations
    (yes the Samba implementation is broken right now) then it
    will be correct (ie. follow the intent of the spec).

    Sorry, can't fix the past, I can only fix the future :-).

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.021 / U:2.920 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site