[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: page fault scalability patch V8: [4/7] universally available cmpxchg on i386
    Andi Kleen wrote:
    > On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 06:41:25PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
    >>On Monday 20 September 2004 23:57, Andi Kleen wrote:
    >>>On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 01:49:20PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
    >>>>On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
    >>>>>I think it shouldn't be this way.
    >>>>>OTOH for !CONFIG_386 case it makes perfect sense to have it inlined.
    >>>>Would the following revised patch be acceptable?
    >>>You would need an EXPORT_SYMBOL at least. But to be honest your
    >>>original patch was much simpler and nicer and cmpxchg is not called
    >>>that often that it really matters. I would just ignore Denis'
    >>>suggestion and stay with the old patch.
    >>A bit faster approach (for CONFIG_386 case) would be using
    > It's actually slower. Many x86 CPUs cannot predict indirect jumps
    > and those that do cannot predict them as well as a test and jump.

    Wouldn't alternative_input() choosing between a cmpxchg and a call be
    the way to go here? Or is the overhead too high in an inline function?

    (No patch included since I don't pretend to understand gcc's asm syntax
    at all.)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.025 / U:23.840 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site