Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:33:15 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: __attribute__((always_inline)) fiasco |
| |
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:50:26AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> The // apart from being a C++ ism (screw C99; it's still non-idiomatic) >> will cause spurious ignorance of the remainder of the line, which is
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 06:21:04PM +0100, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote: > Usual Albert's taste level aside, you are wrong. Comments are replaced > with whitespace on phase 3 (tokenizer) and preprocessor lives on phase 4. > IOW, that // will never be seen by preprocessor.
I'll be sure to put this on file with the rest of the numerous "while legal in C, never *EVER* do this" oddities.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |