[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: __attribute__((always_inline)) fiasco
    On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:50:26AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
    > > #define INLINE static inline // an oxymoron
    > The // apart from being a C++ ism (screw C99; it's still non-idiomatic)
    > will cause spurious ignorance of the remainder of the line, which is
    > often very important. e.g.
    > static INLINE int lock_need_resched(spinlock_t *lock)

    No it won't. Comments are removed in translation phase 3;
    macros are expanded in translation phase 4.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.021 / U:5.352 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site