[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: __attribute__((always_inline)) fiasco
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:50:26AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > #define INLINE static inline // an oxymoron
> The // apart from being a C++ ism (screw C99; it's still non-idiomatic)
> will cause spurious ignorance of the remainder of the line, which is
> often very important. e.g.
> static INLINE int lock_need_resched(spinlock_t *lock)

No it won't. Comments are removed in translation phase 3;
macros are expanded in translation phase 4.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.071 / U:1.920 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site