![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 03:15, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote: > > > Here are traces of a 145, 190, and 217 usec latencies in > > netif_receive_skb: > > > > http://krustophenia.net/testresults.php?dataset=2.6.9-rc1-Q6#/var/www/2.6.9-rc1-Q6/trace2.txt > > http://krustophenia.net/testresults.php?dataset=2.6.9-rc1-Q6#/var/www/2.6.9-rc1-Q6/trace3.txt > > http://krustophenia.net/testresults.php?dataset=2.6.9-rc1-Q6#/var/www/2.6.9-rc1-Q6/trace4.txt > > these all seem to be single-packet processing latencies - it would be > quite hard to make those codepaths preemptible. > I suspected as much, these are not a problem. The large latencies from reading the /proc filesystem are a bit worrisome (trace1.txt), I will report these again if they still happen with Q8. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:05 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||