[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch
Andrea Arcangeli <> wrote:
> if you're scared that there are too many cond_resched (I'm not scared
> and people should enable them anyways if they make a difference, they
> still should be less than the number of spin_unlocks with preempt
> enabled), then you should add a cond_resched_costly and add a config
> option that turns it off.

None of these approaches improves worst-case latency at all on SMP. If
we're not going to address the SMP problem we could just make it UP-only,
in which case increased locking costs are a non-issue.

I'd prefer that we find a solution for SMP too though.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.110 / U:5.180 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site