[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread

On one finds hackbench.c
and the result that 2.6 is much better than 2.4 where scheduling is

I was shown results that go in the other direction, so just tried
on a machine here.

50 processes
2.4.26: 24 sec
2.6.0t11: 72 sec 120 sec

20 processes
2.4.26: 8.6 sec
2.6.0t11: 29 sec 30 sec

This was on a 256 MB 400 MHz Pentium II.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.034 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site