[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread

    On one finds hackbench.c
    and the result that 2.6 is much better than 2.4 where scheduling is

    I was shown results that go in the other direction, so just tried
    on a machine here.

    50 processes
    2.4.26: 24 sec
    2.6.0t11: 72 sec 120 sec

    20 processes
    2.4.26: 8.6 sec
    2.6.0t11: 29 sec 30 sec

    This was on a 256 MB 400 MHz Pentium II.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.021 / U:15.412 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site