![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 01:27:02PM -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote: > > I am willing to do that if the kernel developers think it better. > > It recently occurred to me that jackstart might be able to detect this > situation and exec jackd, anyway. (AFAICT, the only reasonably > POSIX-compliant method for detecting that a process has the > "appropriate permission" to do something is trying it to see whether > it returns EPERM.) how should jackstart detect the situation ? its running SUID root and is allowed to do everything. > > Thanks for helping... > -- > joq > -- torben Hohn http://galan.sourceforge.net -- The graphical Audio language - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||