lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 16 Sep 2004 08:14:38 +0200
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [patch] sched: fix scheduling latencies for !PREEMPT kernels

* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> No, I mean putting cond_resched in might_sleep is ad hoc. But that
> doesn't mean it doesn't work - it obviously does ;)

ah, ok, i understand your point now. No, i'm not submitting the
CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY .config switch (and the kernel.h 2-liner) at
this point. All the latency breakers so far will mainly benefit
CONFIG_PREEMPT - which is also the primary preempt model used by
bleeding-edge testers.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [from the cache]
©2003-2009