Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Being more anal about iospace accesses.. | Date | Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:58:38 -0400 | From | Horst von Brand <> |
| |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> said: > On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Jörn Engel wrote: > > > > But it still leaves me confused. Before I had this code:
[...]
> No, you can certainly continue to use non-void pointers. The "void __iomem > *" case is just the typeless one, exactly equivalent to regular void > pointer usage. > > So let me clarify my original post with two points:
[...]
Could you please put the clarified message into Documentation? It would be a shame if it got lost. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |