[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: The ultimate TOE design
    On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:11:04 MDT, David Stevens said:

    > Why don't we off-load filesystems to disks instead? Or a graphics
    > card that implements X ? :-) I'd rather have shared system resources--
    > more flexible. :-)

    All depends where in the "cycle of reincarnation" we are at the moment. Way
    back in 1964, IBM released this monster called System/360 - and one of the
    things it did was push a *lot* of the disk processing off on the channel and
    disk controller using a count-key-data format rather than the fixed-block that
    Linux uses. So out on the platters, the disk format would say things like "This
    is a 400 byte record, the first 56 of which is a search key". A lot of stuff,
    both userspace and OS, used things like 'Search Key Equal' and letting the disk
    do all the searching.

    There was also this terminal beast called the 3270, which had a local
    controller for the terminals, and only interrupted the CPU on 'page send' type

    Back then, the ideas made sense - it wasn't at all unreasonable for a single
    S/360-65 to drive 3,000+ concurrent terminals in an airline reservation system or
    similar (and we're talking about a box that had literally only half the
    hamsters of a VAX780).

    But today, the 3270 isn't seen much anymore, and currently IBM emulates the CKD
    format on fixed-block systems for their z/Series boxes running z/OS or whatever MVS is
    called now....

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.019 / U:48.524 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site