![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 13 Sep 2004 at 15:45, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > o My only other nit is that you use a different name then xtime. If > > you're changing the type, you might as well use a meaningful name. > > xtime is the traditional name. Maybe renaming it to intentionally break > old code would be good but I thought it would be good to understand > the approach. > I think direct access to xtime should vanish. Provide an inlinable function to get the current time coarsely and quickly (that's what reading xtime is). Ulrich - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||