[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: /proc/config reducing kernel image size
        Hi Tom :)

    * Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen <> dixit:
    > > > There is no point in storing all the comments and unused options in the
    > > > kernel image. This typically reduces the config size to about 1/5th
    > > > before compressing, and to about 1/4th after compressing.
    > > I'm with you in that there is no point in storing the comments,
    > > but I disagree about the unused options. Storing the unused options
    > > as comments is more useful than it seems ;)
    > This is why I added a config option.

    But removing the comments is a good idea. Even reformatting the
    contents, or something like that.

    > > I'm not really sure about it, but I think that the unset options
    > > are left as comments for the sake of automation. The space saving
    > > doesn't (IMHO) worth the pain.
    > I'm not sure either, but I don't know of any programs that uses this.

    Neither do I.

    > Putting this config file inside the same source tree as it was compiled
    > with, and then just starting and stopping menuconfig will restore it to
    > it's original form.

    That's true.

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

    Linux Registered User 88736 &
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.024 / U:46.600 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site