Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:43:27 -0500 | From | Greg Edwards <> | Subject | Re: kernbench on 512p |
| |
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:16:24PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: | Greg Edwards wrote: | | >Manfred, | > | >Lockstat output attached from 2.6.9-rc2 at 512p and 2.6.9-rc2 + your two | >remaining RCU patches at 512p. kernbench was run without any arguments. | > | >The difference for RCU looks great. | > | > | > | Which value did you use for RCU_GROUP_SIZE? I'm not sure what's the | optimal value for 512p - probably 32 or so.
I used what was defined in the patch
+#define RCU_GROUP_SIZE 2
I can try running with a couple different values and see how it looks.
Greg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |