![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 13 Sep 2004 22:40:24 -0400 jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> wrote: > As long as whatever arrangement ensures that no packet reordering > happens, should be sane. Yes, current scheme is broken in some ways (but > guarantees packet ordering within a flow). I think his changes ensure this as well, at least for local system sockets. You'll only get a new hop each time a route lookup is performed, which is only done once per socket unless the path becomes "sick" and TCP decides to try and do a relookup of the destination. I'm kind of ambivalent about these changes. I definitely like the first patch which cleans up those huge functions in route.c :-) But there are things I like about the current behavior, although I understand why people want things to work the way Einar is changing it to. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||