lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 13 Sep 2004 09:23:08 +0200
FromAndi Kleen <>
SubjectRe: more numa maxnode confusions
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 12:15:48AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 08:02:53PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> > >  2) About Aug 9, Brent Casavant sent in a patch changing the set (not get)
> > >     side calls, sys_mbind and sys_set_mempolicy, to N64.  This patch
> > >     removed the following line from the implementation of get_nodes() in
> > >     mm/mempolicy.c:
> > > 
> > > 	--maxnode;> > > > Ah, I wasn't aware that this patch got merged into mainline. 
> > That was a bad thing, because it broke the ABI used by libnuma
> > subtly.> > > > Please whoever merged it revert it.
> 
> Revert what?


http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset@412b8943seoOgs2sAUXJeG1qynkYHQ?nav=index.html|src/|src/mm|related/mm/mempolicy.c
> > > ...> >> > Yes. I appended a patch. Linus or Andrew, please apply it.
> > > > Does this patch perform the above reversion, or is something additional
> needed?

It does it, and nothing else is needed.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [from the cache]
©2003-2008