| Date | Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:01:07 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm5 |
| |
Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> wrote: > > Hello Andrew, > > Please replace patch next_thread-bug-fixes.patch in -mm5 tree with the > last diff-next_thread I sent to you.
I was planning on replacing it with Ingo's patch.
--- linux/fs/proc/array.c.orig +++ linux/fs/proc/array.c @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct task_stru stime = task->signal->stime; } } - if (whole) { + if (whole && task->sighand) {
Is there some reason why your patch is better? If so, please do a full resend.
> And it looks like thread loop in do_task_stat() doesn't require siglock > lock, so you can add the patch attached to reduce lock area.
hm, OK. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|