lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 02:36:05AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> + if (map > &pidmap_array[pid_max/BITS_PER_PAGE])
>> + map = pidmap_array;
>> if (unlikely(!map->page)) {
>> unsigned long page = get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);

On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 02:58:05AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> If pid_max == BITS_PER_PAGE*n, none of &pidmap_array[pid_max/BITS_PER_PAGE]
> is usable, so if we must complete a full revolution around pidmap_array[]
> to discover a free pid slightly less than last_pid we will miss it. Hence:

That could only happen if max_steps were initialized to PIDMAP_ENTRIES
instead of PIDMAP_ENTRIES + 1, so this more accurate upper bound is not
strictly necessary, though with this in place, we could probably reduce
max_steps to just PIDMAP_ENTRIES so we cycle no further than the block
we began; I'll not bother with that.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site