![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
pj wrote:
> I expect that disabling a Memory Node should result in some
> "move_task_off_dead_memory()" routine, ...
> Does this expectation fit for you?
Dave replied:
> That seems pretty reasonable to me. ...
In other words, as is apparent in the reply I just sent a few minutes
ago, what I wrote about "move_task_off_dead_memory()" routine no longer
seems at all reasonable to me ;).
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||