Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: `new' syscalls for m68k | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:48:16 +0100 |
| |
On Gwe, 2004-09-10 at 21:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > - Are sys_sched_[gs]etaffinity() needed for non-SMP? Not really
> - I disabled [sg]et_thread_area() since sys_[gs]et_thread_area() are > missing. Do we have to implement them, or should we use some other > method for Thread Local Storage?
Up to your implementation
> - What about sys_vserver()?
Vserver project - probably dead for 2.6 since the SELinux and other security modules can implement this same things (and a 2.6 vserver one assumes would do likewise)
> - What about sys_kexec_load()?
Depends if you support kexec
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |